ANTI-BULLY FILM A SENTIMENTAL ATTEMPT TO LEGISLATE HUMAN BEHAVIOR

Oh, boy... Here we go with the cinematic version of the Anti-Bully crusade, a film entitled Bully (with the international "NO" symbol very noticeably backwards), that pretends to be a sympathetic exploration of pain and healing and all that other Liberal claptrap, but that is actually just a propaganda flick for a purely political movement intended to create a whole new class of outlaws in the American (and global) population...

New Anti-Bully Film Tugs Heartstrings, But Ultimately It's About Making Human Nature Illegal

Directed by Sundance and Emmy-award winning filmmaker, Lee Hirsch, Bully is a beautifully cinematic, character-driven documentary. At its heart are those with huge stakes in this issue whose stories each represent a different facet of America's bullying crisis. Bully follows five kids and families over the course of a school year. Stories include two families who have lost children to suicide and a mother awaiting the fate of her 14-year-old daughter who has been incarcerated after bringing a gun on her school bus. With an intimate glimpse into homes, classrooms, cafeterias and principals' offices, the film offers insight into the often cruel world of the lives of bullied children.

America's bullying crisis...???  It's a crisis?

Although Bully is described on the movie showcase site Rotten Tomatoes as "hard-hitting and gracefully filmed," and sentimentally depicts kids and families attempting to deal in their own ineffectual ways with human nature, there's no disguising the fact that this is all about LEGISLATING "social change" through new and more draconian Hate Crime Laws, which is absurd on the face of it.

Take a look here at what the Anti-Bully Movement is REALLY all about...

The Anti-Bully Movement: Where Do We Go From Here?

Across the United States and around the world, the anti-bullying movement has become a rallying force. From celebrities telling gay teens that “It Gets Better” to the world-wide attention paid to a bullying incident in Australia captured on video, the problem of bullying in schools has garnered heightened media attention and is being tackled with increasingly stronger laws by communities.

There are anti-bullying laws of varying strength in at least 40 states. Last week (September 1, 2011), New Jersey enacted the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights, the nation’s toughest anti-bullying state law yet; it received both cheers and criticism. The law includes a requirement that teachers and administrators report incidents of bullying to the police, and has raised questions about who should be held accountable for protecting students. It has also sparked debate around the potential implications of criminalizing bullying, as well as how schools are going to pay for anti-bullying programs, given already-slashed budgets and overworked teachers.

But schools and communities agree on the critical nature of the problem. Studies have shown that bullying leads to increased incidence of mental health issues later in life and lower achievement levels, especially for minority students.

“We should call bullying what it actually is — social violence,” said Erin Weed, founder of Girls Fight Back, an organization that provides empowerment and self-defense workshops at schools and college campuses around the country.

The need to end peer harassment is clear. But it isn’t clear how much change is actually happening. Are laws that vigilantly punish bullies like the Anti-bullying Bill of Rights exactly what we need — or putting us down the wrong path? Resolving a case of bullying will take more than just a hotline. It will take squadrons of counselors, legal teams, and school administrators. So what are the most effective ways to spend school districts’ already-limited resources?

This is sweet: "The law includes a requirement that teachers and administrators report incidents of bullying to the police, and has raised questions about who should be held accountable for protecting students."

WHO should be accountable for protecting students?

Ummmm... How about the students themselves?  How about students beating the shit out of those who bully them, the way we did when I was in school?  How about students learning how to defend themselves in school, just as they must defend themselves all throughout their lives?

How about students showing some backbone, rather than running to the protective skirts of the Nanny State, eh?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that ALL the victims of bullying are necessarily spineless; but I am saying that spineless parents raise spineless children, almost invariably.

No. You don't stop bullying by MAKING IT ILLEGAL, for Godsake.

You don't OUTLAW human behavior that is millions of years old.

Rather, you TEACH YOUR KIDS TO FIGHT, to DEFEND themselves. It'll make them better people, much better than if they are surrounded by an impenetrable wall of Socialist feel-good-about-yourself LAWS designed to turn OTHER citizens into OUTLAWS.

About 40 years ago, when I was fresh out of grade school, I entered the entirely new and unexpected social environment of junior high school.  I say "entirely new and unexpected" because nobody EVER told me about Physical Education in the higher grade levels, wherein you are introduced to the horrifying experience of stripping naked in front of complete strangers and donning these ridiculously primitive and ill-fitting gym shorts, okay, which is all you wore for the next hour and a half, indoors and out.

This experience was distressing in that we frequently confronted and jogged past the girls' P.E. class out on the ball field; and several guys, predictably, decided to show off in front of the girls.  This showing off usually manifested as bullying the other guys around them.

Well, bullying the guys that COULD be bullied, that is.

I think it was the second week of 7th Grade — when I had finally acclimatized to the routine — that this buck-toothed redneck named Kelly Donaldson decided to try his hand at bullying me.  This was an unfortunate decision for him, I can assure you.

To make a long story somewhat shorter, I took an aluminum baseball bat and smacked the stupid hillbilly bastard in the mouth with it, which knocked out three of his permanent front teeth and left him bleeding and blubbering in the red dust of the baseball field.

I'm sure it changed his life for the better.  Well, except for having to wear false teeth from a very early age.

It never occurred to me until that moment that I would have to defend myself in such a manner on public school property.  However, if Kelly Donaldson had taken the trouble to research the data on his intended victim (always advisable), he would have known that I had a childhood history of seeing red and hammering guys much larger and much older than myself.

That runs in our family, by the way.  I think it's scientifically termed the berserker gene.

Point is, the very first time Kelly tried his Level One Assault on me, I came back on him with a Level 10 Response.  As a result, nobody EVER tried to bully me for the remainder of junior high or high school.

Oh, sure, there were a few scuffles, including one fight in which I stomped two guys simultaneously for stealing my hat; but there were never any other cases of bullying in my public school experience.

It's like going to prison, you know?  Not that I've ever been to prison, but I know people who have done some time.  If you demonstrate from Day One that you're a hard target in prison, the guys in the rest home respect that, and you won't end up as somebody's bitch.

And it's like that all throughout your life, as well.

Lemmy tell you something, if you allow somebody to push you around ONCE, they'll do it again.  More than that, if you allow somebody to push you around in public, the public won't respect you.

Hey, that's human nature, millions of years in the making.

Now, there is NO CASE on record of humankind LEGISLATING barbarism into obsolescence.  Barbarism is here to stay, for as long as we're human beings.  It's what MAKES US human beings, it's what DEFINES our civilization.

I mean, what is civilization except a cumulative response to barbarism?

We're not going to CHANGE human nature in a few generations or even a few centuries through Hate Crime Laws.  All we're going to do is establish a new class of outlaws who will revel in their barbarity, as the victims whine from within the cage of Socialist lawmaking they have wrought.

The only way to answer bullying is with a fearsome self-defense, one that sends the bully reeling.  That's what bullies respect.

Defensive response is common sense, and it's the first thing that springs to mind.

But, then, you may ask, where is the compassion, where is the Christianity and all that turn thy cheek mentality? Look, I know people often cite Christ's eternal patience, his infinite tolerance for abuse with a citation from the New Testament: Luke 6:29, “And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not to take thy coat also.”

Yeah, just keep poking and prodding me and punching me, and keep stealing my property and I'm okay with all that, right?

NOT.  An examination of the original extended scripture reveals that Jesus was admonishing people to SETTLE OUT OF COURT.

People who try to characterize Jesus as eternally tolerant are sorely mistaken.  Christ had his limits.  I mean, in John 18:23, one of Caiaphas' officers smacked Jesus, who exclaimed “Why smitest thou me?”

Christ said, "Why'd you hit me, man?"  That's NOT turning the other cheek.  That's called confrontation.  We're talking about God in the flesh here, right?  He could've turned Caiaphas and his entourage into frogs at a glance.

Christ walked the walk.  He was all about confrontation.

Christ didn't strike back, but he definitely confronted his assailant.  And THAT is what these victims-in-training SHOULD be doing in the Anti-Bully Movement, rather than pursuing national and global legislation to build a wall around their kids to protect them from LIFE.

AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM BENDS OVER BACKWARDS TO PLEASE THE LYNCHMOB

Well, this isn't surprising, actually... Yesterday (Wednesday, April 11), the Special Prosecutor in Florida decided to charge George Zimmerman with 2nd Degree Murder in the shooting of his assailant, Trayvon Martin, and IN SPITE of the fact that there is NO EVIDENCE that Zimmerman did anything except DEFEND HIMSELF.

Obviously, the Special Prosecutor succumbed to the tempest in a teacup generated by that bloodthirsty lynchmob in Sanford, Florida, and to the threats of retaliatory violence from the black community.

Special Prosecutor Charges Zimmerman with 2nd Degree Murder

Neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman is in a Florida jail, charged with the second-degree murder of a black teenager.

The 28-year-old Zimmerman admits to shooting unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin on February 26 in Sanford, Florida. He claims it was self defense.

Special prosecutor Angela Corey says authorities did not come to the decision lightly, nor was it based on public pressure. "We do not prosecute by public pressure or by petition," said Corey. "We prosecute based on the facts of any given case."

The charge carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. Second-degree murder is typically charged when there is a fight or other confrontation that results in death and where there is no premeditated plan to kill someone.

Second-degree murder is also the highest charge a prosecutor can bring in Florida without a grand jury [because a grand jury would have thrown the case out, based on the facts].

The U.S. Department of Justice is conducting a civil-rights investigation while more than 2 million people signed an online petition, urging Zimmerman's arrest. Marches have been held in dozens of cities...

Did you get that line?   "We do not prosecute by public pressure or by petition"... Yeah, right.  Which is why it took nearly TWO MONTHS for Florida's governor to appoint a Special Prosecutor, and only AFTER mounting lynchmob PRESSURE and a PETITION forced the government to take special action and intervene in a cut-and-dried self-defense case.

There is NO WAY a grand jury would have charged George Zimmerman with 1st Degree Murder, under Florida Law.  Which is why the Special Prosecutor pursued the 2nd Degree Murder charge, sidestepping a grand jury altogether.  It was the ONLY way to get the case before a judge.

Incidentally, there's a VERY high likelihood that a judge will throw the case out, based on the LACK OF EVIDENCE to support the Special Prosecutor's charges.

In which case, the lynchmob will STILL go on rampage.  So, all the Special Prosecutor has done is DELAYED the inevitable.

THEY ALWAYS ANNOUNCE IT ON FRIDAY

Well, the thick plottens... Now George Zimmerman has gone off the grid.  His lawyers can't contact him, he's trying to go public on Sean Hannity, he's been in direct contact with the special prosecutor, it sounds like he's afraid — and rightly so — because people are threatening to kill him.

All of this is transpiring, as I predicted, because the special prosecutor Angela Corey is going to announce on Friday that there's NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE to bring First-Degree Murder charges against George Zimmerman.  His  attorneys dropped the case, undoubtedly because they know there's no trial in the future.

Another 20-year-old jock writes to me, invoking the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s and comparing it to the racial politics we're seeing in Sanford.  

Son, you were not alive at the height of the Civil Rights Movement (early to mid-1960s).  Chances are your parents weren't alive back then, either.  You have NO memory of what real racism is.

I do. 

I lived through the Civil Rights Movement, and I lived in an area of the South where the KKK had billboards and recruitment offices on public streets.  I know that EVERYBODY was living in fear back then, and for a very good reason.  You could get shot dead for speaking out on behalf of blacks.

Race-hate groups were a major influence on local government.

When 1/3 of your local police department is comprised of KKK members, you've got a REASON to be afraid, okay?

Today's generation has NO IDEA of what REAL RACISM is.  In the 1950s and 60s, a black guy hanging from a tree was the epitome of racism.  Today, our thin-skinned and politically correct Western society thinks the "N-word" is the epitome of racism.

Sheesh.

Today's generation thinks that racism is a game of semantics.  Worse than that, they think racism is a viable TOOL for advancing their political agendas. 

Today, the REAL RACISTS aren't Southern Democrats in pickup trucks with chains and ropes and shovels and shotguns, out coon hunting every night, the way it was back in the 50s and 60s.

Today, the REAL RACISTS are the people who use racism to twist arms in the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches of government, and who use racism to extort money and to create a climate of ENTITLEMENT for one race over another.

  

The MAIN PROBLEM we face today is NOT inequality of Justice. The MAIN PROBLEM we face is the implementation of special laws (Hate Crime Laws) above and beyond those laws that apply to everyone, special laws calling for more severe punishment in cases of racially motivated crime.

You DO understand the problem with Hate Crime Laws, right?

To all appearances, such laws only apply to non-blacks.  When was the last time you saw the Mainstream Media headlining the story of a Hate Crime committed by a black person?

We can't progress as a civilization as long as we live in a climate of perpetual REPARATION for injustices committed by our ancestors, okay?

Sure, blacks were exploited by slave traders, but let's tell the truth.  

Slavery between tribes was common in Africa, tribal war prisoners were enslaved, and tribes would SELL their prisoners of war to Dutch slave traders. In more modern times, Black Africans in Rwanda and the Sudan have taken slavery to a whole new level, and the black-on-black atrocities committed in Africa do truly dwarf into insignificance the atrocities of American Slavery, if not the Holocaust.

So, WHO is going to make reparations in Africa, once we're all holding hands and singing Kumbaya in a Global Village about 40 years from now?

The junk they’re teaching in school about race relations and world history is DETRIMENTAL to our progress as a civilization. 

When the mandatory free education system teaches that subsequent generations are RESPONSIBLE for the actions of their forebears — specifically, that blacks are somehow ENTITLED to special consideration and reparation because their long-dead ancestors were enslaved — then they are teaching that we can go back and blame the past for our present failures.

I was not brought up to blame anyone else for my failings, much less demand reparations for some perceived injustice that occurred 150 years before I was born.


(Did you get that little Sanford & Son hook that I threw in there?)

OBAMA'S NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH PROGRAM IS COMMUNIST PARANOIA

Look, somebody posed a question to me about citizens "partnering" with the police and other enforcement agencies — you know, in the spirit of Socialism, sharing surveillance information and coordinating civilian/police patrols and all that bullshit.

Specifically, this reader's query concerned the tragic irony of George Zimmerman being a neighborhood watch captain, which sort of backfired on Barack Obama.

See, Obama said, about three years ago, that he wanted to create this goddamned Neighborhood Watch Program, whereby citizens coordinate with local police and surveil their neighborhoods in order to secure the community, right?

Just like George Zimmerman was doing.

How's that working out for you, Barry?

As an asides, when the Iron Curtain fell in 1989, when Communism collapsed in on itself as it always does, it was revealed to the world that 1 in 3 citizens in East Berlin were KGB informants.  That's pretty intimidating, don't you think?

There's the ultimate evolution of your Neighborhood Watch Program, citizens working hand-in-hand with executive government.

Frankly, I wouldn't WANT Citizens thinking they're qualified to make the complex legal decisions that trained LEOs make.

In my concealed carry class, we didn't just sit there for hours watching a video of some law professor droning on about concealed carry and the use of deadly force. In our case, we had two instructors who would frequently pause the video and then DEMONSTRATE the complex altercation scenarios — those scenarios in which the instigator has his gun taken away from him and he suddenly becomes the victim, for example, in which case the guy with the gun is now the assailant, and back and forth like that.

In spite of the seeming simplicity of one-on-one altercations, such confrontations can become really baffling legal shitholes.

I mean, it's no wonder that trained LEOs don't want to dive into the middle of an altercation. Our instructors told us, very frankly, that they would rather stand back for their own safety when the details of an altercation are unclear, because they may end up on the WRONG SIDE of a bad situation escalating into something worse.

Now, imagine the well-meaning civilian — who is typically untrained in Criminal Justice, deadly force, etc — inserting himself into a very complex altercation, totally ignorant of who instigated the incident, who was an intended victim, who is in the right and who is in the wrong. Most civilians would make an instant judgement, based on who was holding the gun, right? So the civilian might go to the defense of a BAD GUY.

And then THREE MORE guys show up with baseball bats and tire irons, and the civilian doesn't know WHO is the bad guy. In which case the civilian just stuck his nose into a VERY NASTY situation from which he might not walk away.

No. I don't think civilians or armed citizens NEED to be partnering with First Responders, whose JOB is to walk into these hot situations with the LAW on their sides, so the citizen doesn't get mixed up in it.

I mean, if the average citizen wants to "partner" with First Responders, then I suggest that citizen become a certified EMT or a volunteer Fireman or go to the Police Academy and take a Criminal Justice course — I don't think some well-meaning citizen with a Concealed Carry permit (who barely managed to keep all his rounds inside a 2-foot target at 21 feet, okay?), is qualified to attend or is needed in the "crime fighting" community.

Hey, that goes for me, too. In my view, it's enough that I'm alert and aware of the law and that I know my rights and I love packin' heat.

See, I'm making a hard distinction between Citizen Militias and the Executive Branch of government. An armed citizenry is necessary to the security of a free state, and the Central Government is charged with defending the nation against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Those are two different things.

That means the POLICE and the FBI and the BATF and the DEA and the INS and all the other enforcement agencies are operatives of the Executive Branch of Central Government. Their JOB is to defend the nation, under the Constitution.

But the armed citizen's JOB is to keep the Nation FREE. Says so in the Second Amendment.

We DO NOT WANT the free and armed American Citizens partnering with the Central Government, okay? The Citizen Militia CANNOT BE an instrument of the government, it MUST be separate; because, when the Central Government waxes corrupt and oppressive and unconstitutional, all those Executive agencies are going to SIDE with the corrupt government. 

Am I right or am I right?

In which case, WE become the last line of defense of American Liberty.

THAT'S WHY the citizenry should ALWAYS be better armed than the government.

And we ARE better armed than the government, actually. 

I mean, the American Military is comprised of a little over 2 million active personnel, believe it or not. 

The real might of our military is the technology that we have placed in the hands of some 2 million personnel. The various police agencies in this country employ about 800,000 personnel. The Federal enforcement agencies (FBI, DEA, INS, BATF, etc) are reluctant to reveal their personnel numbers; but we know the Federal agencies actually have far fewer personnel than the police agencies, inasmuch as the Federal agencies SPECIALIZE, whereas the police agencies deal in a broadly general way with the public.

So, all told, we can make a guesstimate that there are some 5 or 6 Million armed Executive Branch operatives with licenses to kill. These are the guys who will obey the President's order when TSHTF. 

Remember Katrina.  Remember that the Federal Government sent U.S. Marshals and City Police and the Oklahoma National Guard into the suburbs of New Orleans to force their way into private dwellings to confiscate firearms.

Now, please don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to incite violence or call for an armed insurrection or anything like that. I'm just crunching numbers here.

Facts are, we have, oh hell, let's be generous and say there are 7 Million people in the Central Government who are heavily armed and their job is to take care of "bad guys" both foreign and domestic, okay? Those 7 million Executive personnel are the Guardians, those are the Sentries, those are the Warriors, okay.

I salute.

But these intrepid heroes need to ask themselves What will happen when the U.S. Congress eviscerates the Constitution, tosses its moldering guts in the dumpster, and implements some kind of draconian Martial Law across the land?

Whose orders do you follow? Do you follow your heart and oath and defend the Constitution?  If you do, then you're a traitor.

But. Wait. You've got to follow orders or they'll kill your ass.  It's all so confusing, isn't it?

Man, I do not envy the kids taking the Oath today... There is so much Socialist corruption in our Central Government, they're training the kids to defend the GOVERNMENT, rather than the PEOPLE.

TRAYVON MARTIN CASE: GET READY FOR VIOLENCE IN SANFORD, FLORIDA

Well, the Florida Sate Attorney appointed as special prosecutor in the Zimmerman/Martin case, Angela Corey, is getting ready to make a decision as to whether or not George Zimmerman will be indicted in the February shooting of Trayvon Martin.

Ms. Corey, appointed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott to review all available evidence in the case, is not leaking any hints to the press, although she and the U.S. Justice Department have been working closely with the city government and emergency management team in Sanford, Florida (where the shooting took place).

So, nobody is supposed to know ANYTHING about her impending decision, right?

Yeah, right.

Well, let me TELL YOU what the decision is going to be... George Zimmerman WON'T be indicted and he WON'T go to trial, although he probably WILL be forced to flee Sanford, Florida and go into hiding.

That's because the racially-motivated black community in Sanford wants Zimmerman's BLOOD and they're NOT INTERESTED in Justice unless it's lynchmob justice.

This is the black community that called for "Justice for Trayvon" while simultaneously circulating "WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE" flyers for George Zimmerman, and the same black community that has made repeated death threats to the Sanford Police Chief.

This is the same black community that has threatened retaliatory violence and domestic terrorism if Zimmerman is NOT arrested and indicted and tried for murder.

If you seriously can't guess Ms. Corey's decision in advance, I would suggest reading this little news update from WKMG News in Orlando, Florida...

City of Sanford Prepares for Official Response in Zimmerman/Martin Case

SANFORD, Fla. -The city of Sanford is preparing for the outcome of the special prosecutor's decision about George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin but has not been charged.

Sanford Mayor Jeff Triplett said on Thursday that the city's emergency management team has met regularly with the U.S Department of Justice to construct a plan. Officials said extra police officers and fire department officials are on standby. Neighboring agencies have also been asked to assist, if needed.

  

"Those that would like to make this a defining moment for the city of Sanford are wrong, and we just have to make sure that we do a good job of making sure that that's not our lasting image," Triplett said.

It's not known when Angela Corey, a state attorney appointed as the special prosecutor by Gov. Rick Scott, will make a ruling.

Residents said they feel the pressure of the decision looming over the community.

If it even remotely appeared that Ms. Corey's decision was to arrest and indict George Zimmerman, the City of Sanford and the U.S. Justice Department wouldn't be constructing a plan to handle the riots that are GOING to ensue when Zimmerman goes scot-free.

See, the Sanford mayor and police and fire departments wouldn't be coordinating with the DOJ and calling for backup from neighboring first-response teams unless THEY KNEW the State Prosecutor's decision in advance.

I mean, hell, I told you WEEKS AGO the outcome of this case, based on the available and documented evidence.

I'm telling you, a comprehensive review of the FACTUAL EVIDENCE in the Zimmerman/Martin case is going to deliver Justice, alright; but it's NOT the lynchmob justice the black community demands, and Special Prosecutor Angela Corey KNOWS THAT.

Which is why they're preparing for black violence in Sanford and across the entire country right now.

Oh, you don't think the black community is going to predictably retaliate with racially-motivated violence?

They already are.  Read this comforting little item from the Toledo Blade newspaper in Ohio...

White Victim, 78, Recounts Assault by Six (6) Black Youths Out to Avenge Trayvon Martin

Six juveniles (the youngest 11 and the oldest 17) nearly boxed-in Dallas Watts, a 78-year-old man from East Toledo.

Mr. Watts was on his way home from the nearby Gas Express Mart at Starr Avenue and White Street about 4:45 p.m. Saturday (March 31) when the boys approached him.

One pointed at Mr. Watts and said, "Take him down," the victim recounted in an interview Monday.

Mr. Watts looked at the youth and said, "Why you picking on me?"

Mr. Watts said one of the boys delivered a single blow to the back of his head during the incident, knocking the victim to the ground.

At one point, Watts recalled being lifted from the ground so one of the boys could "drop-kick" him in the chest.

One boy, Watts said, put his foot on the back of the Watts' neck, with another shouting, "Kill him!"

While Mr. Watts was down the boys kicked him over and over, shouting, "[Get] that white [man]!  This is for Trayvon ... Trayvon lives, white [man]!  Kill that white [man]!" according to a police report.

This story, as you can tell, is HEAVY on political correctness, taking care not to mention the fact that Mr. Watts is white and the "six juveniles" were all black.  Of course, the heavily-censored quotes reveal the truth of the matter.

Does anyone out there really need a translation?

"Fuck that white muthafucka!  This is for Trayvon!  Trayvon lives, white muthafucka!  Kill that white muthafucka!"

In passing, the article mentions that the 17-year-old (one of two "juveniles" who were arrested for the attack) also faces a felonious assault charge in the unrelated shooting of 24-year-old Mark Bolling on March 18, less than two weeks earlier.

And here's another warm and fuzzy moment on the streets of Baltimore, Maryland (St. Patrick's Day of this year), as a mob of blacks not only beat a lone white man to the pavement, stole all of his property, stripped him naked and laughed, but also RECORDED the assault and posted it online...

.

Oh, but we KNOW blacks — and particularly black male teens — aren't disposed to racially-motivated violence, right?

I mean, to DELIBERATELY IGNORE and DENY the fact that blacks perpetrate racially-motivated violence is WORSE than racism, okay?  This incident is merely a suggestive preview of the black violence that's bound to transpire in the coming weeks, as soon as George Zimmerman walks.

Mark my words.  If I'm wrong, you can call me a racist.  But I'm not racist and I'm not wrong, either.

GET READY FOR THE GALE OF ANTI-GUN RHETORIC

The anti-gun lobby (the Jim Brady organization and Eric Holder among them) are CONSTANTLY attempting to twist the Second Amendment into something it never was and NEVER SHOULD BE.

Right now the Jim Brady organization is hammering Concealed Carry, as well as Florida's so-called "stand your ground" law. They're HAMMERING it. I just heard a representative of the Brady organization on the radio today, very ANGRILY attacking the Second Amendment and claiming that responsible gun ownership is contributing to a MENTALITY OF VIOLENCE that America WILL NOT TOLERATE.

I don't know about you, but when I show my gun, everything EXCEPT violence happens. When I meet and talk with gun owners who ARE carrying concealed and who ARE openly carrying a Glock in a side holster, we have the most pleasant conversations imaginable.

The anti-gunners claim that WE (gun owners) are living in FEAR.

Well, again, I don't know about all of you, but I'm probably the LEAST FEARFUL individual on my street, if not in my town. And it's not a gun that gives me courage — it's not a weapon of ANY KIND that gives me courage. You know what Gunny Ermey would say: "It is the HARD HEART that kills." And I don't care WHAT weapon is available or not available. If anti-gunners had their way and banned all public gun ownership, then we'd become a nation of swordsmen. Ban the swords and we'll go to knives. Ban knives and we'll switch to clubs.

Because It's the HARD HEART that Kills, not the weapon of the moment.

How much is a family worth? It's worth whatever you happen to pick up to defend it. In my case, I want the most awesome weapon available, okay? Unfortunately, I can't afford an AA12 Combat Shotgun; but, if I could afford it and the numerous registrations and permits required, I'd have an AA12.

And that's not because I'm afraid. It's because I know who's out there. Frankly, violent criminals don't concern me that much, because that's one-on-one, or maybe two-on-one, and I can handle that. Hell, I used to be a bouncer in a strip club, and that's a WHOLE DIFFERENT kind of bouncing.

You know what concerns me? It's the criminals in high office, it's the anti-gun lobby, it's the movement to DESTROY our Constitutional Rights. And when you speak out about what the Second Amendment DOESN'T say, you're actually exposing your IGNORANCE of what it DOES say.

Flat-footed, the Second Amendment says that a WELL REGULATED Militia comprised of ARMED CITIZENS is necessary to the Security of a Free State. It says BECAUSE a Militia is necessary, the Central Government SHALL NOT INFRINGE on the citizens' RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR arms.

Do you understand the IMPORT of the Second Amendment? It's NOT saying that A Police Force or National Guard is an acceptable SUBSTITUTE for armed citizens.

Do you know why?

It's because every police force and every National Guard outfit in the country OBEYS the Central Government. We know that when FEMA went into New Orleans, they brought in U.S. Marshals and Oklahoma National Guard and New Orleans Policemen to go door-to-door and disarm the citizens.

When the Central Government goes BAD, goes CORRUPT, starts oppressing the citizenry, WHO is going to come to the rescue? The CENTRAL GOVERNMENT? LOL

Hell no.

The Second Amendment establishes the NECESSITY of a NON-GOVERNMENTAL Citizen's Militia. The term "well-regulated" has been used by anti-gunners for DECADES to attack this amendment. But if you understand the spirit of the amendment, you know the Founders weren't going to hand the organization of the Citizens Militia over to the GOVERNMENT. Because the Citizens Militia is NECESSARY to secure a free state when the Central Government goes bad.

Anti-gunners just assume the Central Government is always RIGHT and BENEVOLENT, they assume the Central Government is going to establish a perimeter around the USA with watchtowers and high fences and sharpshooters to protect the 300 MILLION unarmed American people, right? And, in truth, they don't want a SOVEREIGN United States, they want an ASSIMILATED American Union, with free trade and no religion and everybody hold hands and sing Kumbaya.

Anti-gunners are spineless idiots.

So, when I hear somebody say, "The Second Amendment doesn't say anything about concealed carry," that's when I come back and say, "Go peddle your anti-gun propaganda somewhere else."

The Second Amendment WANTS GUNS in the HANDS of CITIZENS so that we can FIGHT BACK against an oppressive and tyrannical Central Government. Not against a foreign power, not against a foreign invader, but against OUR OWN GOVERNMENT.

Only GUN LAWS have made a distinction between concealed and open carry. This falls under the heading of INFRINGING on our RIGHT to keep and bear arms. Come to think of it, the MAJORITY of the 23,000 gun laws in America are UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the Second Amendment.

Pardon, but KEEPING and BEARING ARMS is our American RIGHT, and I don't care if it's a shoulder holster or an ankle holster or a paddle down in your pants, it is OUR RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR ARMS.