TOXIC REIGN: Reclaim Our Future

When author Charles Austin Miller opens a can of whoop-ass on Washington's political madness in his book, Toxic Reign: Reclaim Our Future, we ask that you please fasten your safety harness and keep hands and feet inside the rollercoaster for the duration of the ride. Cited in 2010 by the Anti-Defamation League as a purveyor of "violence-inciting speech," Charles Austin Miller unapologetically excoriates the failing administration of Barack Hussein Obama and anyone even remotely associated with it. 

Miller pulls no punches as he guides his readers through a high-level, whirlwind tour of Obama's ineptitude, inexperience, and outright stupidity less than two years into what most Americans fear is the worst presidency in history. Bounding from Healthcare Reform to Global Warming to Illegal Aliens to the Deepwater Horizon "catastrophe" to the Globalist Agenda and much more, Miller does not hesitate to wade into the foul muck that is Washington politics and shimmy in the cesspool.

Buy TOXIC REIGN: Reclaim Our Future at Amazon

Buy TOXIC REIGN: Reclaim Our Future at Barnes & Noble

The State of New York has implemented the most draconian and confiscatory gun laws in the nation. Make no mistake, they are violating the Constitutional rights of the citizens of New York. It's time to speak out with a FIGHT BACK NEW YORK tee-shirt, coffee mug, or other rebellious item. Features the legend FIGHT BACK NEW YORK, silhouette of an M4A3 semi-auto rifle, and the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Order FIGHT BACK NEW YORK Mugs,         T-Shirts, Caps & Assorted Rebellion Wares HERE!!

ARMCHAIR WARRIORS, KEYBOARD PATRIOTS, AND A NATION OF COWARDS

What kind of cowardly nation has this become?

All across the Internet, I see "patriots" speaking out against unconstitutional gun control legislation, I see "patriots" uttering these dire pronouncements and warnings about our loss of Liberty. However, when it comes to actually taking up arms to FIGHT our increasingly corrupt central government, these same "patriots" turn and run with their tails between their legs, like scalded dogs.

Except that's an insult to scalded dogs.

The Second Amendment is NOT about hunting or sport shooting or personal protection. Those arguments were created by ANTI-GUNNERS who have attempted for decades to twist and distort the original intent of the Founders on the subject of gun ownership. Anti-gunners want us to SETTLE for hunting and sport shooting and personal protection — plinking at burglars and chicken thieves — as our sole reasons for possessing firearms.

But that's NOT why the Founders drafted the Second Amendment.

The Founders had just come through a REVOLUTION against their government, a revolution against a vastly superior and better-armed military force. It was a revolution in which less than one-third of the American people participated, actually. The rest of Americans were still aligned with King George III or just didn't want to get involved. Thus, the Patriots were greatly outnumbered and outgunned.

Yet they WON.

They drafted the Constitution NOT to grant Rights to the citizens of the new United States, but to PROHIBIT American government from EVER infringing on our fundamental Rights, those Rights with which we are born, our Rights as human beings.

And they drafted the Second Amendment as a contingency, just in case ANY government — including our own — chose to deprive us of our Rights. Make no mistake, the Second Amendment is about taking up arms against our government. It's about shooting at the government. It's about fighting any armed force the government assembles against the People. It's about killing the tyrants in our government. It's about mingling THEIR blood with our own.

As Thomas Jefferson is famously quoted saying: "The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.  It is its natural manure."

Now, that's bloody and gory and scary, and it SHOULD be... But it should be scarier to the government than it is to the People. Because the Constitution is on the PEOPLE'S side, not on the government's side.

You need to understand that. Today's spineless liberals need to understand that; the filthy, corrupt central government needs to understand that; and, more than anyone, the armchair "patriots" out there need to understand that.

Your Right to keep and bear arms is about taking up arms and overthrowing your tyrannical government. It's about bullets flying, it's about people killing each other, it's about fighting the tyrants in our midst to preserve your Liberty.

The government doesn't want you to remember this, which is why they've been indoctrinating students for decades with anti-American, anti-Constitution BULLSHIT in the public schooling system. Anti-American liberals don't want you to remember it, either, which is why they've been selling you this "violence is never an option" BULLSHIT for the last fifty years. And anti-gunners don't want you to remember it, which is why they've tried to convince you that the Second Amendment only applies to hunting, sport shooting and personal defense.

As Americans, we have a DUTY to fight back, to take up arms and fight our government in the most violent and bloody fashion possible. The Founders knew that. And our modern government knows that, too — otherwise they wouldn't be trying to disarm the nation.

So, you armchair "patriots" and keyboard warriors and flaccid NRA stooges need to get off your fat asses and stop preaching non-violence and start thinking about putting your guns where your mouths are. You'd better be ready to pull a trigger in defense of your Liberty, or else you're no better than the spineless liberals and Socialist cowards who are currently pulling the Constitution out from under you.

WHY A MODERN AMERICAN 
GUN BAN MUST FAIL...

See, we have a little thing called The Second Amendment that plainly states the government shall not infringe on our right to keep and bear arms. Owning guns is a RIGHT bestowed upon us by a Creator (or, for the atheists out there, by virtue of our birth). Our Constitution says the government SHALL NOT INFRINGE on this very basic Right.

Driving a car is a PRIVILEGE bestowed by the government, so they can license you to death with an automobile, or even revoke your drivers license. But the government CANNOT prevent American citizens from keeping and bearing arms, under the Constitution.

There’s a very good reason for that.

The TRUTH of the Second Amendment is that it protects for American citizens the RIGHT to use firepower to bring down their own government, when that government becomes tyrannical and oppressive. The whole REASON for the Second Amendment is quite clear: To Secure a Free State.

That’s the part of the amendment that very much distinguishes gun ownership as a DUTY…not merely a form of personal self defense or sporting entertainment. The Founders INTENDED for Americans to ALWAYS wield at LEAST as much firepower as the government. To Secure a Free State.

Governments, you see, can NEVER be trusted to secure our Liberty. Armed Americans must ALWAYS be able to remove a tyrannical government by force of arms, when all other methods are exhausted.

The Declaration of Independence lays out, in a general fashion, the source of our Rights:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

Certain unalienable [sic] rights, that AMONG THESE are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness… You will notice that the Declaration does not specify ALL of the basic Rights with which we are endowed, but it alludes to MANY Rights.

The Constitution and Bill of Rights (the original ten Amendments) later elucidated upon the Rights granted us by the “Creator” — again, for the atheists out there, this means the Rights with which we are endowed by virtue of our birth. These are our BASIC rights.

The Constitution did NOT bestow any rights upon us. From the outset, the Constitution ASSUMES that we ALREADY HAVE these Rights, and it goes to great lengths to PROHIBIT the government from infringing upon those Rights.

When the government “becomes destructive of these ends” — seeking to infringe upon our Rights and deprive us our Liberty — it is our RIGHT to alter or abolish that government. This means by ballot or by bullet.

THAT is why the Right of citizens to keep and bear arms is protected immediately in the Second Amendment to the Constitution. Gun ownership wasn’t far down on the list; rather, it was addressed IMMEDIATELY after freedom of religion and freedom of speech.

You do understand why these Rights were at the TOP of the list, don’t you? It’s because these are the Rights that are FIRST to come under attack by an oppressive and destructive government.

Take a look around you today… What Rights are under attack, every day, in the headlines? Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech, and Freedom to Keep & Bear Arms. That’s because these Rights are, by far, the most dangerous to any form of government seeking to oppress its people.

The Founders knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and their foresight was and is timeless.

This is your president...

ANTI-BULLY SPEAKER IS A BULLY (ASSHOLE) TO CHRISTIAN STUDENTS

As I've mentioned before, the so-called Anti-Bully Movement is nothing but a political crusade to set new politically-correct standards for INTOLERANCE... Anti-Bully crusaders characterize themselves as VICTIMS, but they are, in fact, the VERY ASSHOLES who victimize others.

Check out this news story of prominent Anti-Bully speaker Dan Savage (who advocates on behalf of gay teens, usually), who attacked Christian teens to such a degree that the kids got up and walked out of Savage's stupid, bigoted address...


Anti-Bully Speaker Dan Savage Curses and Insults Christian Teens

As many as 100 high school students walked out of a national journalism conference after an anti-bullying speaker began cursing, attacked the Bible and reportedly called those who refused to listen to his rant “pansy assed.”

The speaker was Dan Savage, founder of the “It Gets Better” project, an anti-bullying campaign that has reached more than 40 million viewers with contributors ranging from President Obama to Hollywood stars. Savage also writes a gay sex advice column called “Savage Love.”

Savage was supposed to be delivering a speech about anti-bullying at the National High School Journalism Conference sponsored by the Journalism Education Association and the National Scholastic Press Association. But it turned into an episode of Christian-bashing.

Rick Tuttle, the journalism advisor for Sutter Union High School in California, was among several thousand people in the audience. He said they thought the speech was one thing – but it turned into something else.

“I thought this would be about anti-bullying,” said Tuttle. “It turned into a pointed attack on Christian beliefs.”

Tuttle said the speech was laced with vulgarities and “sexual innuendo not appropriate for this age group.” At one point, he said Savage told the teenagers about how good his male partner looked in a Speedo.

As the teenagers were walking out, Tuttle said that Savage heckled them and called them pansy-assed.

Dan Savage is a bigoted, intolerant scumbag who is WORSE than the "bullies" he pretends to despise.

This is exactly the sort of thinly-veiled bigotry that I've cited before, no better than the disgusting, racist lynchmob in Sanford, Florida, demanding "justice" for Trayvon Martin, while circulating "WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE" flyers for George Zimmerman and making death threats against Zimmerman.

Yeah, there IS an analogy to be drawn between these "anti-bully" ASSHOLES and the Left-wing lynchmob RACISTS who are given a pass from this sickening Socialist society.

No, you DON'T deserve lynchmob justice, and you DON'T deserve a soapbox from which to spew your hateful, seething, bigoted rhetoric.

You deserve a BOOT in your ASS, if there's enough room in there, Dan Savage.

HERE WE GO: EVIDENCE IS GOING TO EXONERATE GEORGE ZIMMERMAN

As I've said for weeks, the documented evidence in the Zimmerman/Martin case is hard-core going to exonerate George Zimmerman; in fact, the judge may very well dismiss this case before jury selection.

Make no mistake, this is a cut-and-dried self defense case with a MOUNTAIN of corroborating evidence.

The prosecution knew this going in, but Special Prosecutor Angela Corey buckled under public pressure and TRIED to serve this up as Second-Degree Murder, just to satisfy the lynchmob in Sanford, Florida.

The one piece of evidence that is going to bat this thing out of the park is a photo of the back of George Zimmerman's head.  Zimmerman said that Trayvon Martin was pounding his head into the pavement, which is why Zimmerman shot his assailant.

The bloody photo, taken about three minutes after George Zimmerman drilled Trayvon Martin, is solid proof that Zimmerman's life was in danger.  There are two distinct lacerations and a significant contusion on Zimmerman's scalp, distinctly visible in the photo.

Zimmerman's Head Bloody, Bruised & Battered

ABC News has released a new photo of the back of George Zimmerman’s head, taken just “three minutes after he shot and killed Trayvon Martin.” His head is brutally bloodied. As the image above shows, there’s blood all over his head, at least two gashes, and a large bruise forming at the top of his head.

Zimmerman’s contention all along has been that Martin was bashing his head against the pavement, which is why he was forced to shoot him. The media – especially ABC News -- initially attempted to discount that story completely, releasing video of his booking at the Sanford police station that were not well-pixellated, and thus did not show the gashes on the back of his head.

It took several days for ABC News to release an enhanced version of the video that showed that there were gashes on Zimmerman’s head. In the meantime, the media had a field day reporting that Zimmerman had shot Martin essentially in cold blood; Martin’s family claimed that Zimmerman was not injured; members of Congress, without any evidence, attempted to pass a resolution labeling the killing a racially-motivated crime.

ABC News reports that the source of the new photo was a witness to the aftermath of the event, and that Zimmerman asked the source to call his wife for him after the shooting.

Martin’s family attorney, Benjamin Crump, suggested that the photo didn’t mean anything because Zimmerman wasn’t brought to a hospital for stitches. “How bad could it have been if they didn’t take him to the hospital [and] didn’t stitch him up,” he asked. But that statement, of course, if Zimmerman’s head was being bashed against the ground, he had no legal obligation to wait until his injuries required immediate hospital attention.

I like that asinine statement from attorney Benjamin Crump: "How bad could it have been if they didn't take him to the hospital and didn't stitch him up?"

Well, of course, Ben, when somebody is hammering your head into the pavement, you don't WAIT until your brains are spilling out before you defend yourself.  In fact, you defend yourself so that your brains remain inside your skull.

No, Trayvon didn't even need to spill Zimmerman's blood.  When Trayvon first ATTACKED George Zimmerman, he was posing a life-threatening danger — it was Trayvon's INTENT to commit bodily harm.

Under the law, Zimmerman could have drawn and pulled the trigger before Trayvon pounded his head into the pavement.  I mean, when a guy mugs you, the attack begins with the rush.  It's the INTENT of the assailant unleashed, okay?  Trayvon INTENDED to commit bodily harm.  If Zimmerman had seen it coming, he could've legally dropped Trayvon when the kid rushed him.

But he didn't.

You know, they teach you in concealed carry training to maintain a good distance from a potentially threatening subject.  Seven yards, seven big steps, about 21 feet is a good distance.  That's because 21 feet is the distance a motivated human being can traverse in one second.

One second.  A guy with a knife or a screwdriver or a baseball bat or any given weapon can cross 21 feet of space and be ON YOUR ASS in one second.

One second is also how long it takes for an alert individual to draw and present a handgun.  On average.

Your personal space is only as secure as your ability to defend it.  Your personal space, I'm telling you, is about 21 foot radius when you are armed with a handgun.  If somebody rushes you, rushes your personal space, you have one second to defend it.

Now, we know that George Zimmerman attended concealed-carry training because he has a concealed-carry permit.  Additionally, he is studying criminal justice.  So, I'm thinking that Zimmerman HAD to be thinking in terms of LAW when he followed and accosted Trayvon.

He asked Trayvon WTF, right?  What are you doing in this neighborhood?

Trayvon, who is a 17-year-old, 6'2" football player, cops a confrontational teenage attitude and probably told George to go fuck himself.

George Zimmerman retreated to his SUV, probably warning Trayvon that the police were on the way.

Trayvon, who is a 17-year-old teenager, and who IS confrontational by all accounts, lashes out at this little 5'7" neighborhood watch captain.

You know, if you think a 17-year-old male doesn't LOOK for trouble, you're living in a fantasy.  A 17-year-old boy is having these epiphanies on the threshold of adulthood, he THINKS he knows it all, and he IS going to confront people.  Confrontation driven by anger.

Because his wiring is not finished, right?  You KNOW I'm right.

Trayvon Martin's death is a case of Natural Selection, my friends.  Death by Misadventure.

Now, here comes Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, who I do not particularly respect because of his slippery and elastic way with the Law, but who SLAM DUNKS the Zimmerman/Martin case...
PROSECUTION IS NOT ONLY IMMORAL, BUT STUPID

With ABC News’ release of the George Zimmerman photo showing blood flowing freely from his head, the question becomes whether Angela Corey, the prosecutor in the case, had access to the photo before charging Zimmerman with second-degree murder.

The arrest affidavit did not mention the photograph, or the bleeding, gashes, and bruises on Zimmermans’ head. Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law School stated upon release of the arrest affidavit that it was “so thin that it won’t make it past a judge on a second degree murder charge … everything in the affidavit is completely consistent with a defense of self-defense.”

After the release of the photo, however, Dershowitz went much further, telling Breitbart News that if the prosecutors did have the photo and didn’t mention it in the affidavit, that would constitute a “grave ethical violation,” since affidavits are supposed to contain “all relevant information.”

Dershowitz continued, “An affidavit that willfully misstates undisputed evidence known to the prosecution is not only unethical but borders on perjury because an affiant swears to tell not only the truth, but the whole truth, and suppressing an important part of the whole truth is a lie."

When asked if it made a difference whether the prosecution had the bloody photograph at the time they charged Zimmerman, Dershowitz responded, “We do know that there were earlier photographs before the affidavit was done that strongly suggested blood on the back of the head, and we know the police had first access to him, so if there was blood they [the prosecution] would know about it …

"I've had cases in Florida against prosecutors,” Dershowitz said, “and this is not the first time they have willfully omitted exculpatory evidence. It's a continuing problem. Here, it’s not only immoral, but stupid. The whole country is watching. What do they benefit from having half-truths in an affidavit?"

Dershowitz added, "I'm not taking sides, but I'm insisting that both sides play by the rules, and so far the prosecution is not playing by the rules."

That means it's cut-and-dried self-defense.  Zimmerman walks.  Probably no trial.

I hope this experience has provided the seething, screaming jackals of lynchmob Justice in Sanford, Florida with at least a GLIMPSE of how REAL Justice works in America.